When the U.S. Teachers Pension Funds Don't Have to Pay Teachers Retirement Benefits ~ Gurukam Lanka

When the U.S. Teachers Pension Funds Don’t Have to Pay Teachers Retirement Benefits

In January, the U in the United States Teachers Pension Fund (USTP) began a plan to make teachers pension benefits contingent on the employer paying their retirement.

Since then, the program has been met with considerable criticism.

The proposal, which was first reported by the Wall Street Journal, would require the teachers’ retirement benefit to be contingent on an employer contributing the amount the employee has been paid in retirement.

While the plan would likely help to mitigate some of the costs that teachers have to incur as they transition from a traditional pension to a 401(k) plan, some are concerned that it could lead to a larger percentage of teachers who are still earning their full salaries being forced to pay a greater portion of their benefits into a 401 plan.

According to the Journal, “In some states, it’s a no-brainer to contribute the full amount of your pension and leave the rest in a 401, which can offer much better tax advantages.”

According the paper, the majority of teachers’ pensions are dependent on their employers contributing the full pension and not the portion of it that is not being paid to them.

But many teachers are not fully compensated in their retirement and so they could potentially end up having to pay more into their 401 plan than they would in their traditional retirement.

This would likely force many teachers to take out more of their retirement in the hope of being able to keep their current pay.

One group of teachers in particular has faced an additional risk with the retirement plan: their dependents.

“When we are looking at what we have to do, it would be nice to have the support of both parents to make it happen,” said a teacher who asked to be identified as “Toby.”

“If I had a child, I wouldn’t be able to retire on time, and they’re not,” he said.

“It’s hard to imagine the support I would have if I had to rely on my parents.

It’s a tough situation.”

In fact, according to the teacher, if teachers did not have to pay into their pension, the benefits they would receive would likely be less than what they are paid in a traditional 401(p).

In January, a number of educators, including the president of the National Education Association (NEA), signed a letter to President Trump and Congress calling on the Trump administration to delay or block the plan.

The letter said the current plan “may be a positive step toward achieving a better retirement for our country’s teachers.”

But the NEA’s president, Arne Duncan, told the Journal that the group has been working with the White House and the Pension Protection Agency (PPA) to craft a plan that would meet the needs of the teachers.

“The best way to get the pension benefits you deserve is to have a plan in place for when you retire,” Duncan said.

He added that teachers would not have an easy time “getting their benefits if they don’t get the plan in order.”

“If we are able to work together, we can make sure we can meet the requirements for the teachers that we need to,” he continued.

Meanwhile, the teachers union has called for the PPA to release the full details of the plan that has been crafted.

Although the union has not officially released the plan, the union’s president called the plan “the best we can do for teachers.”

“The pension plan is an example of how we can work together with other stakeholders to ensure the teachers benefit is shared equally,” said Michael Schwartz, president of SEIU Local 1176 in a statement.

This is not the first time the PFA has sought to address the issue of teachers pension funding.

In December, SEIU-AFTRA released a proposal that would require employers to contribute at least 20 percent of their pension into a 529 plan, which would then be matched with a portion of the funds.

However, SEIU, the AFL-CIO, SEIF, SEPTA, and the National Association of State Retirement Administrators (NASRA) have all rejected the plan since it did not include a mechanism to ensure that employers would contribute the funds at the same rate as employees.

As of March 31, the PEPB is set to release its retirement plan for teachers.

[Image via Shutterstock]